Anchor Choice: a Generational question


Author
Message
Dick
Dick
Forum Expert (972 reputation)Forum Expert (972 reputation)Forum Expert (972 reputation)Forum Expert (972 reputation)Forum Expert (972 reputation)Forum Expert (972 reputation)Forum Expert (972 reputation)Forum Expert (972 reputation)Forum Expert (972 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 970, Visits: 1.3K
The following is one of a series of Safety-at-Sea thoughts that first appear in the OCC’s e-bulletin.
Anchor Choice, a generational question
There is safety-at-sea and there is safety-at-anchor. Being safe at anchor often gets overlooked until zero-dark-thirty and a squall is coming through.
Writing about anchors usually stirs up a hornet’s nest of response, but I believe that the evidence is in that the new generation of anchors (SPADE, Rocna, Manson, etc.) is superior to the old generation (CQR, Bruce, Delta, Fortress, etc.). They are so far superior that I believe a case can be made that having a new generation anchor approaches being a safety issue: much like having and using jacklines and tethers offshore.
Some of us do a lot of anchoring, many do not, but every vessel should have an anchor that is dependable and easily deployed. I am not saying that the old generation anchors can’t anchor safely: after all, they have for generations. But I am saying that the new generation do everything significantly better: which translates into safety-at-anchor and peace of mind when the wind starts to howl.
I have been in a number of ports these last few years where boats that wander widely congregate and, almost without exception, the word is out: every boat sports a new generation anchor on the bow.
I hate to suggest that a valued anchor who has been a trusted piece of gear be turned into a lawn ornament, but safety suggests that one’s bower anchor be chosen from the new generation.
Safe anchoring, Dick Stevenson, s/v Alchemy
Questions as to the actual anchor, among the new generation of anchors, has already seen some discussion in the Forum.


Reply
Dick
Dick
Forum Expert (972 reputation)Forum Expert (972 reputation)Forum Expert (972 reputation)Forum Expert (972 reputation)Forum Expert (972 reputation)Forum Expert (972 reputation)Forum Expert (972 reputation)Forum Expert (972 reputation)Forum Expert (972 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 970, Visits: 1.3K
Philip Heaton - 2/27/2020
Hi Dick
Yes, the weight difference in anchors at the bow is not an issue.  In fact we increased our chain length from 60 to 80 metres so that was a chunk of weight too.  Moreover with all the kit, spares, provisions etc that we added to the boat for our Pacific and onward cruising we had to raise the waterline anti-fouling.  Since being in the Med we have gone in for a major declutter but with the weight of two outboards and liferaft mounted on the pushpit this somehow seems to avoid us being bow down ... or even stern down.  We are also quite happy with what may be a higher than usual waterline/boot-top
As for the effectiveness of the Manson vs the Delta, although the former does not necessarily set first time in all circumstances we have found that it does set more readily than the Delta - not scientific analysis of course but there you go ...
Cheers Phil

Hi Phil,
Give me well reported field data over scientific analysis most any day. Glad you are pleased. Dick
GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...





Login

Search